Skip to comments.
Mel Gibson: $5 Mil to Fringe Church (FOX attacks "antiquated Catholic ideology")
FOX ^
| Friday, February 20, 2004
| By Roger Friedman
Posted on 02/20/2004 5:46:17 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-333 next last
To: CobaltBlue
You say, "You prefer the mass in Latin, I like it just fine in English. You like altar rails, I don't miss them. I like being able to watch the priest's face rather than his back, but the other way was OK, too."
1. But what you prefer is immaterial. The Mass isn't about you or any of us. It's about worshiping God appropriately. It's not supposed to be entertaining.
2. Kneeling for Communion expresses adoration for the Real Presence. Standing doesn't, but subtly subverts this belief.
3. Cardinal Ratzinger addressed the importance of facing east in his work, The Spirit of the Liturgy: "A common turning to the east during the Eucharistic Prayer remains essential. This is not a case of something accidental, but of what is essential. Looking at the priest has no importance. What matters is looking together at the Lord." (p. 81.)
To: rogator
How many are attending fundamentalist or Morman churches? - Plenty. True ... I are one ...
242
posted on
02/20/2004 4:52:38 PM PST
by
AgThorn
(Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Folks opposed to Gibson's movie are doing their dead level best to exemplify their own stereotypes.
It's amazing....2000 years later and quite a few of the same cast members.
I can't recall LaLa Land ever this motivated against a movie since "Cruising" maybe...20 years ago.
243
posted on
02/20/2004 4:53:16 PM PST
by
wardaddy
("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet")
To: ultima ratio
Your quarrel is not with me, but with the Church.
To: dixiepatriot
Concise...I agree largely.
245
posted on
02/20/2004 5:00:35 PM PST
by
wardaddy
("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet")
To: Jim Cane
...And Rome is not in union with The Word. What'ryegonnadoo? so true ..
246
posted on
02/20/2004 5:00:45 PM PST
by
AgThorn
(Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
To: Clintons a commie
Gibson follows an excommunicated sect.
He, therefore is excommunicated. The Decree excommunicating Marcel Lefebvre was issue by John Paul II in 1988.
247
posted on
02/20/2004 5:03:42 PM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: CobaltBlue
Are you Roman Catholic yourself? Traditionalist? Just curious as to what makes you qualified to judge whether someone who's rejected Vatican II is "in full communication with the Church Yes, I'm Catholic. And any baptized person who holds to the Catholic faith is a Roman Catholic, according to my catechism. I certainly don't have any authority to say that anyone is a Catholic. But neither does anyone-except for the Pope- have the authority to excommunicate Gibson.
To: CobaltBlue
Are you Roman Catholic yourself? Traditionalist? Just curious as to what makes you qualified to judge whether someone who's rejected Vatican II is "in full communication with the Church Yes, I'm Catholic. And any baptized person who holds to the Catholic faith is a Roman Catholic, according to my catechism. I certainly don't have any authority to say that anyone is a Catholic. But neither does anyone-except for the Pope- have the authority to excommunicate Gibson.
To: Ann Archy
Relax. I admitted I was mistaken. Read the entire thread.
Oh, and relax.
250
posted on
02/20/2004 5:08:29 PM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: leprechaun9
There was also a very good reason behind the use of Latin, it united the Church across national borders, it was basically a way to circumvent the "Tower of Babel" issue.
251
posted on
02/20/2004 5:23:40 PM PST
by
olde north church
(American's aren't more violent, we're just better shots!!!)
To: sinkspur
He, therefore is excommunicated. The Decree excommunicating Marcel Lefebvre was issue by John Paul II in 1988.Gibson isn't affiliated with the Society of St. Pius X, so Cardinal Gantin's declaration of ipso facto excommunication doesn't concern Gibson.
Also, the ipso facto declaration of Lefevbre and the bishops associated with him do not apply to anyone other than the bishops, let alone the faithful who attend Society chapels. In fact, recently Bishop Perle of the Eclessia Dei Commission said that it was permissable to attend Masses at Society chapels and even could even make a donation to the collection.
Finally, when the local Bishop of Hawaii declared five Catholics who attended the Society chapel in Honolulu excommunicated in 1993, Cardinal Ratzinger himself declared that the Bishop overstepped his authority and that the people who attended the chapel were Catholics in good standing.
You need more evidence to declare Gibson a schismatic than the fact that he attends a unauthorized Latin Mass.
To: Clintons a commie
You need more evidence to declare Gibson a schismatic than the fact that he attends a unauthorized Latin Mass. I no longer care.
253
posted on
02/20/2004 5:30:08 PM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: Eva
There is a lot of nonsense printed about traditional Catholics in the newspapers by reporters who don't know what they're talking about. Gibson's father may be a sedevacantist--someone who is Catholic but believes the present pope is illegitimate--but there has never been any indication that Gibson shares his view.
To: ultima ratio
I hate it when irreligious people try to express opinions about any type of Christianity. They think that we are all nuts, and speaking of nuts, I think that Mel's dad may be a little senile.
255
posted on
02/20/2004 6:31:57 PM PST
by
Eva
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Gibson is no stranger to controversy when it comes to voicing his opinion about his religious beliefs. In a 1992 interview with the Spanish magazine El Pais, his comments about homosexuals which cannot be printed here caused an international stir.Here, we get to the real reason why so many in the media want Mel to fail. God forbid that anyone have an opinion that differs from the Official Follywood Dogma!
256
posted on
02/20/2004 6:33:43 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: dennisw
I suggest that Jews stay home and not see the movie. Period. This is a Christian movie by a man of faith designed to be understood by Christians. I suggest that Jews take the advice given to Christians when an anti-Christian movie is made--don't buy a ticket.
To: CobaltBlue
The notion that a good Catholic can't reject Vatican II is ridiculous. It was a pastoral, not a dogmatic council--hence nothing it decreed is binding. In fact, it was a disastrous event which led to a widespread collapse of the faith.
To: CobaltBlue
The Church's quarrel is with its own history and tradition.
To: sinkspur
You're still talking about "decrees of excommunication" issued by the Pope against the SSPX. This is patent nonsense. There was no decree. It was latae sententiae--automatic, an assumption based on the violation of a canon law. But the same law provided exceptions--one of which Archbishop Lefebvre evoked in good conscience. Hence, no excommunication.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-333 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson