[sinkspur]

That is, of course, your usual spin. But you are wrong, and, yes, incredibly dead wrong.

Well, I'll let folks judge for themselves. This is, after all, your post:

At some point, a priest is going to take the USCCB and the Vatican into the courts either here or at the World Court for violation of human rights by violation of its own internal process etc.

[Siobhan]

Well, I'll let folks judge for themselves. This is, after all, your post:

No, that would be untrue. That is not my post. That is your editing of my post and placing it in your usual context of spin and bait.

You succeed with some people some of the time through these tactics -- largely because they take seriously your claims to be Roman Catholic and a deacon of the Church. But as I have told you I do not believe I would regard you as a Roman Catholic were we ever to dig deeper in discussions about the Faith of Holy Mother Church. My intuition tells me from your posts, your conduct, your treatment of other posters, that it is unlikely that you hold the same Roman Catholic faith that I share with many faithful Catholics on FreeRepublic.

I am certain you have a faith, a mission, and zeal. But my observations thus far tell me your faith is alien to what I know as the Roman Catholic faith, your mission is at odds with the vocation of deacons, and your zeal raises more questions about your real motives than answers.

[broadsword]

That does not look like cheerleading to me. Not at all.

[Antoninus]

Well, I'll let folks judge for themselves. This is, after all, your post:

I judge Siobhan's post to be utterly innocuous and certainly not worthy of turning it into a bludgeoun to beat her with.

Since when is that an appropriate way to treat a lady?