"The Faith is under attack. You may not think so. But I do, and if you want, I can prove it to you. "
http://www.traditioninaction.org/bev/062bev02-03-2005.htm
That's a great link! The TIA site has lots of other links to check out, too, including this one:
http://www.traditioninaction.org/tiabk008.htm
It is our moral duty to know about these things, and to clearly show that deliberately ignoring them out of some artificial fear of being "opposed to the pope" is somehow offensive to God. It is a travesty linked with the modernism of Newchurch that so many Catholics have developed this irrational fear, which is actually a victory of satan, a kind of diabolical disorientation, which Our Lady warned us would come to pass if the commands of heaven were not obeyed. They were not, and now we have D2. We have D2 in the hearts of well meaning faithful, because one of the symptoms of Modernism is you don't know you are infected.
It is HIV of the Faith, D2.
The Pope has D2, and perhaps he doesn't know he's infected. That doesn't make him invalid. That doesn't mean he is no longer Pope. That doesn't mean he is not infallible. Pope John Paul II carries the power of papal infallibility. It's at his fingertips at all times. But has he exercised it? The last time any pope used this charisma and made it public for all to see was Pope Pius XII on All Souls Day, Nov 1st, 1950 A.D. I was not born yet, and I'm pushing 50. He defined the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary body and soul into heaven, which now every human creature must give their assent lest they automatically excommunicate themselves from the Catholic Church.
The link I provide, above, shows pictures of the present pope and his immediate predecessors egaging in various activities that their immediate predecessor, Pope Pius XII would have probably rather died than do, but I don't know for sure. He was not squeaky clean, either. He did some things that got the ball rolling, not the least of which was to appoint the barbarian Hannibal Bugnini to his post of influence from whence he would proceed after the death of Pius XII to usher in the "greatest catastrophe of History," the words of Professor Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira, a great counter-revolutionary scholar and historian. Another one of his crimes against the Faith was to introduce changes to Holy Week and Good Friday, which until that time were the most ancient of the Church's liturgical texts.
It has been presented by several learned historians of the Church that these first rumblings of the revolution to come tested the resolve of the faithful. If Catholics the world over had spoken out in the 1950's and had vociferously rejected these first changes, we would never have come to the abominable state where today we have arrived. In fact, it was worldwide urging to make the Assumption a defined dogma that gave Pius XII the encouragement he needed to do it. He would have listened to that same voice, if it had spoken clearly in disapproval of the later changes.
But what do we have today? We have his successor who has been presented time and again with petitions of the faithful to make the Collegial Consecration as commanded by heaven; millions of people have cried out asking for this signal grace, and their cry falls on deaf ears. It is apparently more important to Pope John Paul II to entertain 160 rabbis commemorating the 160 years since the conversion of Alphonse Ratisbonne:
http://www.traditioninaction.org/SOD/j112sdOLMiracles_1-20.htm
Of course, the unprecedented meeting of rabbis in the Vatican does not publicly acknowledge the connection to Ratisbonne. That would be to "dangerous" (read: too honest).