Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevinbud

I think it is for precisely the reasons which you stated that the whole and entire third Secret of Fatima was not revealed - neither in 1960, nor in 2000.

It "called a spade a spade".

A common story surrounding the conversion of St. Mary Magdalene is that when she was being accused of her sins by the Jews with the elders of the Tample watching.....having been caught in adultery & condemned to death by stoning, that Jesus bent down and began to write in the sand.

My understanding is that he wrote the sins of those who were about to stone her - in public, on the ground, for all to see. They walked away in horror.

So it seems to be with the real and whole text of the third Secret. All was to be exposed - for all to see, hear & read. It was for that reason that Our Lady wanted the text exposed to the light of day.

when you turn over a rock in the woods, all sorts of disgusting slimey things are exposed to the light of day..........and slither away.


116 posted on 02/20/2005 1:21:22 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: thor76

Its so sad for me that it wasn't revealed,almost crushing.
I have not lost my faith in God,but I no faith at all in anything that comes out of the vatican.
It is so clearly a coverup,that if this were to be a judged by independent legal experts,not a single one of them would would agree with the vatican.


117 posted on 02/21/2005 1:22:44 PM PST by Kevinbud (Pray,Pray,Pray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson