St. Augustine cited a number of Greek Fathers when discussing that very topic.
But the Catholic arguement is simplest when reduced to its basic terms. In the creed, we "confess one Baptism for the remission of sins". We Christians have always baptized infants. Ergo, we are baptizing them for the remission of sins, when they have as of yet comitted none of their own, with a rite which includes exorcisms that obviously presume the unchristened child is under the power of the devil.
But really, you seem to think as though St. Augustine were acting in a vacuum. All the while that St. Augustine was refuting the heretics, he was receiving copious support from other Churches, and especially from Rome, where Popes such as Zozimus and Boniface acted upon St. Augustine's condemnations and expelled heretics like Julian of Eclanum from the Church. If St. Augustine were saying thing that the rest of western Christendom did not believe, then he certainly had the whole lot of them quite fooled, given his near unanimous support in Africa, Italy, and elsewhere, and the quick acclimation of the genius of his works after his death.
What would a council do with the Dictatus Papae?
Why must it do anything? This is not a dogmatic document.
while we are really quite content with the status quo
How can one be content with violating the will of the Lord that "all may be one"?
I'm not content at all about the situation of division.