[sionnsar]

["from the full span of Anglican Communion tradition" -- hm. Well, okay. That explains the absence of groups such as the ACN, FIF-UK, etc. But whenever they talk about "inclusivity" and its sister word "diversity", I keep thinking of the following: --sionnsar]

[sionnsar]

Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

[wagglebee]

Hell, this isn't at all "inclusive", they should be including the Rastafarians, Voodoo witch doctors, Druids and Wiccans!/sarcasm off

[Conservative til I die]

To clarify what should already be clear, the term 'Catholic' here is referring to Anglican pseudo-Catholics, not real ones.

[BelegStrongbow]

Whilst I recognize how absurd it is to point out, given the basic mortality of the sins being trumpeted as normal in the excerpt, it does bear noting that the intent to mislead the faithful is evident and clear. Thus, they are the worst form of liars and false prophets.

I know, I know, to them that's a real 'SO WHAT', but it just bears repeating, just as often as they repeat the lie that they somehow represent anything close to a consensus of Anglicans, much less Catholic ones. I wonder if they lie to each other with such frequency?

In Christ,
Deacon Paul+