Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JOEL OSTEEN ISSUES APOLOGY
http://www.joelosteen.com ^ | June 2005 | Joel Osteen

Posted on 07/01/2005 8:17:31 AM PDT by Terriergal

Dear Friend, 

Many of you have called, written or e-mailed regarding my recent appearance on Larry King Live.  I appreciate your comments and value your words of correction and encouragement.

It was never my desire or intention to leave any doubt as to what I believe and Whom I serve.  I believe with all my heart that it is only through Christ that we have hope in eternal life.  I regret and sincerely apologize that I was unclear on the very thing in which I have dedicated my life.

Jesus declared in John 14; I am the way, the truth and the lifeNo one comes to the Father but by me.   I believe that Jesus Christ alone is the only way to salvation.  However, it wasn’t until I had the opportunity to review the transcript of the interview that I realize I had not clearly stated that having a personal relationship with Jesus is the only way to heaven.  It’s about the individual’s choice to follow Him.

God has given me a platform to present the Gospel to a very diverse audience.  In my desire not to alienate the people that Jesus came to save, I did not clearly communicate the convictions that I hold so precious.

I will use this as a learning experience and believe that God will ultimately use it for my good and His glory. I am comforted by the fact that He sees my heart and knows my intentions.  I am so thankful that I have friends, like you, who are willing to share their concerns with me.

Thank you again to those who have written. I hope that you accept my deepest apology and see it in your heart to extend to me grace and forgiveness. 

As always, I covet your prayers and I am believing for God’s best in your life, 


Joel Osteen
Pastor - Lakewood Church

Click here for What We Believe.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Theology
KEYWORDS: apology; joelosteen; larrykinglive; osteen; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: sonrise57
I agree--however, the media has done a great job of distorting and lampooning the message

So what's new? Been happening since the beginning.

41 posted on 07/01/2005 1:47:56 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

he is a phoney huckster.
Prosperity teacher. Money grubber.
Check his web sites, there are NO mentions of financial accountability. That is a big sign.

He doesn't want anyone to know he is filthy rich.

Anybody who listens to his crap is an idiot.


42 posted on 07/01/2005 2:28:09 PM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Thanks for posting this.


43 posted on 07/01/2005 2:31:57 PM PDT by k2blader (Was it wrong to kill Terri Shiavo? YES - 83.8%. FR Opinion Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Osteen's biggest advantage right now is that the TV appearance was on the Larry King show on CNN. It is no longer a very widely watched program. I still think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing, just like Rick Warren, Bill Hybels and Robert Schuller, in presenting a sugar coated, "Gospel Lite".
Not much talk of sin, Hell, the Blood, the Cross, etc. Just "feel good" "happy, happy, happy" cotton candy.


44 posted on 07/01/2005 5:55:10 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

I did not see the show. Cancelled the cable. But I have seen this guy on a number of tv interview shows where he has repeatedly avoided or dodged that question. It seems to me if a christian cant answer a question as basic as that they got some issues they need to deal with. The question of do you believe that Jesus is the only way to heaven is the question all christians who take a public stand will be asked. Their answer will greatly depend on whether they want to be a God-pleaser or a Man-pleaser (old PETRA tune). LOL!


45 posted on 07/01/2005 6:43:47 PM PDT by buckeyesrule (God bless Condi Rice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I know this particular dead dog was kicked on another thread (i took part) so I'm not replying to that part. When you say traditional churches, do you mean the more prominent denominations? I am just curious as to what these traditional churches you are talking about are preaching that is so bad. It might be self explanatory to me if I just knew which pastors/churches you meant. Examples would be awesome if you find the time.


46 posted on 07/01/2005 8:29:10 PM PDT by milquetoastdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: milquetoastdog
When you say traditional churches, do you mean the more prominent denominations?

I would say that any church or church denomination that would join the National Council of Churches might be suspect. While I am sure that there are many fine pastors in those denominations, the fact that the majority of them would vote to join an organization that essentially stands for everything a Christian ought to oppose would be a good indicator of a problem. A problem, I'd say, which is much worse than any soft or mushy doctrines taught by Osteen or Warren.

47 posted on 07/01/2005 8:43:56 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (A preposition is something you should never end a sentence with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Sorry, but I am not familiar with the National Council of Churches (been saved under 2 years and only attend an expositional teaching church). Are these really Christian churches (as opposed to Jehovah's Witness or Mormon church)? Does the National Council of Churches have an unbiblical stance on beliefs that the churches agree to or something? Really curious if you have the time...our church is"independently owned and run" if you know what I mean and do not favor centrally run denomination-type stuff.
48 posted on 07/01/2005 9:03:17 PM PDT by milquetoastdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: milquetoastdog

National Council of Churches

1/89

NEW YORK CITY, NY (FR) - The National Council of Churches (NCC), known by many as the most liberal religious organization in the U.S., is reported to be in serious financial straits because of declining membership in the mainline churches which support its work.

"Much of their income is based on the membership of the churches they represent," said Dr. Tim LaHaye of the American Coalition for Traditional Values. "These liberal, main-line churches have been losing members during the past few years, due to the extreme liberalism expressed from their pulpits."

The NCC typically condones abortion, feminism, massive government regulation, and homosexuality. "It is no accident," continued Dr. LaHaye, "that at a time when conservative churches are bulging at their seams, liberal churches are dying."

The National and International Religion Report (Nov. 20, 1988) released statistics to show that the NCC has been consistently cutting its staff during recent years. In 1968, 187 people were employed in its New York office. In 1988, that figure had dropped to 83; at a recent board meeting, an announcement was made that the staff would be cut again to 61 in 1989.

LaHaye believes that one of the main reasons for the NCC's problems has been its support for radical causes - including many communist regimes throughout the world. "This has disillusioned many of the laity who have taken steps to withhold funds from the NCC," he added.

NCC Treasurer Joyce Sohl, of the United Methodist Church, acknowledged the Council's financial difficulties, emphasizing that "the crisis did not just start in 1988. It started several years ago. It has affected various parts of the Council at different times."

49 posted on 07/01/2005 9:05:35 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (A preposition is something you should never end a sentence with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Confirmed my feeling that he might be in this for the money actually.


50 posted on 07/01/2005 9:10:54 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I didn't realize you meant churches that were that liberal and far from the mark. It's terrible, but I do believe that people are speaking out against their unsound people-pleasing doctrines.
Before I was saved I attended a Methodist Church, and after getting saved I went to the Methodist's main website and they have tolerance for abortion - I was shocked (although that would have been cool with me before I knew the Lord). Compromise is their downfall.
I had seen some unbiblical teaching by Osteen on his website before, but that is no longer posted on there. I have mistrust since his posted sermons hinted at positive confession (my church is totally against the Word of Faith movement in that it entails some Eastern Mysticism and isn't biblically sound). Since those are no longer posted I can have hope that he is learning and turning around. I have not heard anything as bad as accepting homosexuality, abortion, etc., but I haven't read much about him denouncing it either. Either way, thanks for the time to explain who you were referencing.
51 posted on 07/01/2005 9:25:38 PM PDT by milquetoastdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Despite his incorrect position that God intends to save everybody (which Camp would agree with me on), I find it admirable that he has such an open heart to the truth.

That is great.


52 posted on 07/01/2005 9:30:55 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I didn't realize you were such a fan of Osteen.


53 posted on 07/02/2005 12:09:43 AM PDT by Gamecock ("Nice" people aren't beaten to a y pulp, nailed onto a cross and then left to suffocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
I didn't realize you were such a fan of Osteen.

I'm sure that you will agree that his ministry, such as it is, has been ordained by God.

54 posted on 07/02/2005 1:23:28 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (A preposition is something you should never end a sentence with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I am sure you agree that God turns some people over to their sins.


55 posted on 07/02/2005 1:31:53 AM PDT by Gamecock ("Nice" people aren't beaten to a y pulp, nailed onto a cross and then left to suffocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

What sin has Osteen committed that you have not committed?


56 posted on 07/02/2005 1:34:15 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (A preposition is something you should never end a sentence with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I wouldn't know. I am only responsible to God for my own sins, not those of others.


57 posted on 07/02/2005 1:37:47 AM PDT by Gamecock ("Nice" people aren't beaten to a y pulp, nailed onto a cross and then left to suffocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; P-Marlowe
I am responsible

I always knew it. I've been looking for someone to blame for lots of things. For example, why is my insomnia operating right at this moment?!

YOU are responsible.

58 posted on 07/02/2005 2:13:52 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If it makes you feel better to blame me, have at it.


59 posted on 07/02/2005 2:16:55 AM PDT by Gamecock ("Nice" people aren't beaten to a y pulp, nailed onto a cross and then left to suffocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

About 4 hours and the old back aches. I either get up or it goes out. Got any pills, doc?


60 posted on 07/02/2005 2:18:56 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson