While giving a lukewarm nod to Church teaching, the reviewer at the USCCB Office for Film & Broadcasting seems to be more than a little turned on by this "superb..." "well-crafted..." film which portrays the "need for love which everyone feels but few people can articulate...."
Strangely, this reviewer gives Brokeback an L rating (limited adult audience) rather than the toughest rating that can be given which would be O for morally offensive. Yet how can it not be morally offensive with this description?
"This film contains: tacit approval of same-sex relationships, adultery, two brief sex scenes without nudity, partial and shadowy brief nudity elsewhere, other implied sexual situations, profanity, rough and crude expressions, alcohol and brief drug use, brief violent images, a gruesome description of a murder, and some domestic violence.
which is all the more puzzling, when the USCCB gave:
The Matrix an O rating (Excessive violence and recurring profanity)
Bad Boys II an O rating ( stylized graphic violence, and a sexual encounter)
Caddyshack an O rating (obnoxious characters, lewd jokes)
1 posted on
12/14/2005 11:22:01 PM PST by
Antioch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Coleus; NYer
2 posted on
12/14/2005 11:23:40 PM PST by
Clemenza
(Smartest words ever written by a Communist: "Show me the way to the next Whiskey Bar")
To: Antioch
Any guy who sees this is gay.
You can't even claim your girlfriend dragged you to see it- if she is able to, then you are too gay for a girlfriend.
I predict the biggest box office flop of the year
3 posted on
12/14/2005 11:25:22 PM PST by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
To: Antioch
The USCCB: An entirely morally bankrupt leftist institution that is entirely in communion with the Church. Or is it "subsisting in the Church"?
4 posted on
12/14/2005 11:32:26 PM PST by
nonsumdignus
(Is Sainthood your Goal?)
To: Antioch
The Matix should have gotten a PDB rating for Pretentious Derivative Bore.
6 posted on
12/14/2005 11:33:10 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(An agnostic who never, ever says "Happy Holidays")
To: windcliff
"Gay cowboys eatin' pudding...."
10 posted on
12/14/2005 11:47:36 PM PST by
onedoug
To: Antioch
Why do they keep calling them cowboys? They are gay shepards.
17 posted on
12/15/2005 12:49:50 AM PST by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Antioch
While the actions taken by Ennis and Jack cannot be endorsed, the universal themes of love and loss ring true.
***
No they cannot be endorsed, but this film review seems to endorse the whole concept big time.
I certainly do not pretend to have any knowledge regarding the film reviews, but isn't it rather odd that there is no byline for this review. Guess he didn't want to be "outed".
18 posted on
12/15/2005 1:02:41 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
To: NYer
Look at this disgusting, slobbering kiss for a pro-homo movie.
19 posted on
12/15/2005 1:03:44 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Antioch; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Catholic Ping Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
22 posted on
12/15/2005 3:04:08 AM PST by
NYer
("Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
To: Antioch
Except for the initial sex scene, and brief bedroom encounters between the men and their (bare breasted) wives, there's no sexually related nudity.Except for the sexually related nudity, there's no sexually related nudity...
Who can take this crap seriously?
26 posted on
12/15/2005 4:07:47 AM PST by
old and tired
(Run Swannie, run!)
To: Antioch
The USCCB gave a bad review to The Passion of the Christ. That along with this is all you need to know about the USCCB.
27 posted on
12/15/2005 4:13:08 AM PST by
Varda
To: Antioch; All
Look at this ad they are going to try to run in the "red states" to trick people into seeing the movie.
28 posted on
12/15/2005 4:14:45 AM PST by
backhoe
(The Silence of the Tom's ( Tired Old Media... ))
To: Antioch
Gerri Pare, David DiCerto and Anne Navarro are on the staff in NYC for the office of Film.
The Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys an anti-Catholic movie that included incest, got the same rating, "L". Go figure...
29 posted on
12/15/2005 4:47:03 AM PST by
Dominick
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
To: Antioch
I guess "hot button issue" is the new term for "mortal sin"?
And all the sexually-related nudity isn't too much sexually-related nudity?
And according to the gay publication that reviewed it, the guy who wants to break up his marriage comes off as "courageous," whereas the one who refuses to abandon his wife and children comes off as "cowardly"?
Lovely. Just...lovely.
32 posted on
12/15/2005 5:01:36 AM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
("Gay." To think it used to mean "happy.")
To: Antioch
Insane. Caddyshack got the big "O", but this tribute to gay-love didn't???
I give up.
To: Antioch
On the trip, Jack proposes that they chuck their families and buy a ranch, but Ennis -- who as a child witnessed the aftermath of a hate-crime murder of two rancher neighbors who had lived together -- can't bring himself to do it. *************
I'm shocked at the tone of this review. Shocked, and disappointed.
34 posted on
12/15/2005 5:11:07 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Antioch
An appalling review. The reviewer should be fired.
35 posted on
12/15/2005 5:14:21 AM PST by
Thorin
("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
To: Antioch
Nothing surprises me anymore. I wish I could be shocked by something like this.
36 posted on
12/15/2005 5:31:18 AM PST by
murphE
(These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
To: Antioch
**film which portrays the "need for love which everyone feels but few people can articulate...." **
What about the love for their married wives? (I haven't seen this, but heard the comment {or read it} on a Christian review.
I think we need to send our judgments to the USCCB.
37 posted on
12/15/2005 5:50:30 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Antioch
We could always contact our individual Bishops and let them know that we think this movie should have received a 0-morally objectionable rating.
http://www.usccb.org/bishops.shtml
39 posted on
12/15/2005 6:00:08 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson