1 posted on
12/31/2005 5:12:37 AM PST by
Popman
To: Fzob
2 posted on
12/31/2005 5:13:03 AM PST by
Popman
(In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
To: Popman
I think the guy has a point, but this statement is proving hard to digets:
Evangelicals maintain headship in the sphere of ideas, but practical decisions are made in most evangelical homes through a process of negotiation, mutual submission, and consensus, Moore said. Thats what our forefathers would have called feminism and our foremothers, too.
I attempt to operate as the biblical head, but the above sounds like a fair description of my household, and it also sounds like Ephesians 5. Headship implies an ultimate authority, but it would seem to be an abuse of that authority not to take the other person's wishes into account and, unless there's a good reason not to, accommodating them.
8 posted on
12/31/2005 5:23:06 AM PST by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: Popman
The feminization of Christianity. It doesn't work.
9 posted on
12/31/2005 5:24:22 AM PST by
bella1
To: Popman
?Egalitarian views are carrying the day within
evangelical-&-catholic churches and homes, Moore said, because complementarians have not dealt sufficiently with
the forces that drive the feminist impulse: Western notions of consumerism-666 and therapy-666?
1st Timothy 2:11-15
1st Timothy 2:5
Hebrews 1:1-3
/Narnia pagan nonsense
15 posted on
12/31/2005 5:33:57 AM PST by
maestro
To: Popman
research has shown many conservative and evangelical households to be among the softest when it comes to familial harmony, relational happiness and emotional health, Moore saidDoes this mean anything in English, or did it come from a Random Gibberish Generator?
19 posted on
12/31/2005 5:53:26 AM PST by
Tax-chick
(I am just not sure how to get from here to where we want to be.)
To: Popman
Evangelicals maintain headship in the sphere of ideas, but practical decisions are made in most evangelical homes through a process of negotiation, mutual submission, and consensus, Moore said. Thats what our forefathers would have called feminism and our foremothers, too. A lot of our forefathers supported slavery, too ... and used the bible to justify it.
The concept of "submission" has historically been abused and taken to an extreme. But it's only simple biblical law and order that starts in the home. When a decision has to be made and cannot be agreed to, someone has to be in charge. And it's the husband's responsibility, not right.
This "submission" the bible speaks is the the wife's responsibility to agree to a husband's decision only after negotiation, mutual submission and consensus should fail.
20 posted on
12/31/2005 5:56:05 AM PST by
manwiththehands
(My Christmas wish: I wish Republicans were running the country.)
To: Popman
Instead, Moore said, a biblical view of male headship and gender roles actually protect against spousal and child abuse because it does not posit male privilege, but instead demands male responsibility. Something that needs to be kept front-and-center, IMO. The same passage which calls on wives to submit to their husbands also calls on husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the Church. My wife is called upon to submit to my headship. I'm called upon to be crucified for her.
"Could we please re-negotiate this package, honey? I'm not sure this trade is as fair as I thought it'd be ..."
35 posted on
01/04/2006 9:48:34 AM PST by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson