Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; jo kus
I don't understand why John 20:23 is not sufficient for you. Can it get any plainer that that?

Speaking just for myself, I will admit that this one is more difficult to interpret as to "match" the rest of my theology. I don't feel secure enough to pronounce a slam dunk, as I would in other cases. :) But ultimately, we have a plain meaning apparent contradiction between this and Mark 2:7. Something has to give via interpretation. Naturally, we will both choose the interpretation that matches. And, I think that to an unbiased judge, a credible case could be made for either view.

4,454 posted on 04/07/2006 5:40:12 PM PDT by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4327 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper

I disagree, because John 20:23 speaks directly to the issue, while Mark 2:7 is a rhetorical question posed by the Pharisees, that Christ chose not to answer in sufficient detail right then and there. The relation to the question, can Christ delegate the power to forgive sin to others? -- is only lateral in Mark 2:7


4,459 posted on 04/07/2006 7:56:03 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4454 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson