Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mike182d
If the Vatican does not define what is "inadequate for liturgical use" the current abusers of liturgical music will rationlize their way out of it and everything will continue as it was.

One rationale I've heard for not defining specifically is that if you say no guitars the next Sunday a ukelele will appear in its place and so on. I don't know that I buy this explanation but I'm sure there will be some liturgical lunatics who will experiment to see what they can get away with. Unless you have a Bishop willing to knock some heads together there isn't much the Vatican can do except lead by example and try to correct what is wrong in the seminaries.

103 posted on 03/22/2006 2:11:03 AM PST by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Diva
One rationale I've heard for not defining specifically is that if you say no guitars the next Sunday a ukelele will appear in its place and so on.

Ugh. Very true.

It would probably be a whole lot easier if the Vatican just said "you can only use gregorian chant, piano, or pipe organ" instead of leaving an open-ended directive for liturgists. The would eliminate any inevitable ukelele wiggle-room.
106 posted on 03/22/2006 5:50:59 AM PST by mike182d ("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson