Aa, ah, the usual ad hominem response. Don't address the subject, just change to the "anonymous internet poster". You are a master at this.
However, I note for your further consideration, that you have never disproved the Pixie Theory of Aerodynamics. I asked you to post evidence against it---you have offered no evidence against it. And, just who do you think you are? to assert YOUR belief to be paramount over those of the family values of Pixies?
Lyle is the same. He has a Theory of the Ark. He is probably a fraud, but maybe a true-believer. All of this can be explained by Pixie Theory. Teach the controversy. Follow the money.
You are missing the point. If you take the position that there must be a "natural" explanation for every aspect of the Noah's flood story, then you must dismiss the story out of hand. The story itself claims that God brought the animals to Noah. That's not something you are ever going to observe in Nature again.
Tigers and pigs feeding together.
OK, I'll bite. What's the "Pixie Theory of Aerodynamics"?