Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
No --- you have it backwards. Verse 14 comes before verse 16. There is no other way to read it --- unless you stand on your head.

Actaully, No. Again. 14 is the fact of the Gentiles coming then James says, this is in accord with the following 1) restoration, 2)gentiles.

v 14 is James' description of Peter's description and not a part of the passage he was quoting, which (again) states that the order of things is FIRST the restoration of david and THEN inclusion of Gentiles.

261 posted on 05/23/2007 1:43:44 PM PDT by DreamsofPolycarp (Ron Paul in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: DreamsofPolycarp
Actaully, No. Again. 14 is the fact of the Gentiles coming then James says, this is in accord with the following 1) restoration, 2)gentiles. v 14 is James' description of Peter's description and not a part of the passage he was quoting, which (again) states that the order of things is FIRST the restoration of david and THEN inclusion of Gentiles.

Nope --- "After this I will return" --- After what???? --- After visiting the Gentiles [nations] to take out of them a people for his name. Was God finished visiting the nations and taking out of them a people for his name when James said this in 49 AD???? Nope. It was ongoing. It started at the House of Cornelius and it is still going on today. We haven't reached the "after this" part yet.

269 posted on 05/23/2007 2:11:01 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson