Huh? By your own sentence, you just said I answered your question. Now you're asking it again?
the answer is still the same. Ratzinger does nothing to disprove the clain in the WCF.
***Nice of you to answer it once. How do you handle that passage in the WCF? Do you ignore it?
Huh? By your own sentence, you just said I answered your question. Now you’re asking it again?
the answer is still the same. Ratzinger does nothing to disprove the clain in the WCF.***
Once again you pose questions that aren’t there, answer questions that aren’t posed and ignore questions that are. I asked you here that if you don’t consider Benedict XVI to be the antiChrist, how do you reconcile it with the WCF?
I understand that these questions are hard and go to the core of your religious heresy, but please try to stay on topic.