Your post in this thread:
Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:00:48 PM · 288 of 383
Dr. Eckleburg to MarkBsnr
Then you ought to really consider the words of the WCF
I do. Every word based on Scripture.
and whether you consider Pope Benedict XVI to be the antiChrist. Well, do you?
You’ve asked this twice now. Perhaps you think I’m afraid to answer it or something. Nope. My answer is that Ratzinger isn’t doing much to dispel the notion
**********
This is where you say that you don’t consider Pope Benedict XVI to be the antiChrist.
***Show me where I wrote “I don’t consider him to be the antiChrist?”
You’ll have a long time looking for that post.***
It took me all of 30 seconds. I don’t understand why you wouldn’t think that I could resurrect your post in which you have stated what you have stated.
Are you claiming now that he IS the antiChrist?
Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:00:48 PM · 288 of 383
Dr. Eckleburg to MarkBsnr
Then you ought to really consider the words of the WCF I do. Every word based on Scripture.
and whether you consider Pope Benedict XVI to be the antiChrist. Well, do you?
You've asked this twice now. Perhaps you think I'm afraid to answer it or something. Nope. My answer is that Ratzinger isn't doing much to dispel the notion
This is where you say that you don't consider Pope Benedict XVI to be the antiChrist.
One of us must be blind. Where in the above sentences do I say I don't believe the words of the WCF?
Is it my use of the word "nope?"
"Nope," you'll note, is in answer to my rhetorical question: "Perhaps you think I'm afraid to answer it or something."
To which I responded "nope."
As anyone who can read can see, I have not in any way questioned the WCF or denied it or said I don't believe it.
Yeesh. But this does serve to prove my earlier point -- you prefer to deflect rather than debate.