Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

To ascend for Mary is to do what Christ did: go to heaven under her own power. Mary, we teach, was assumed: taken up by God. That is consistent with her being given wings and going where the river of vomit does not reach her. Heaven, indeed, is merely inferred from that chapter, and were we to take it literally we would say that she was flown to some remote desert and not assumed to heaven.


62 posted on 05/13/2008 3:13:29 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

Any inferring in scripture is first toward those passages that are similar to this one. They are in Daniel, Genesis, and earlier in this Revelation. The woman herself is best seen in the light of the OT prophets’ references to the woman (people of God) God desired to have for Himself. Unfortunately, she always adulterated herself and was rejected. This one, however, is faithful.

She is driven into the wilderness. She gave birth to our Lord. Mary was representative of her. The faithful who say “yes” to God.

There is definitely no assumption of Mary in this passage. In fact, too much makes it impossible to be Mary.


66 posted on 05/13/2008 4:40:57 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson