Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So. Baptists Stand Against IMB's Tongues, Baptism Guidelines
Christian Post ^ | Jun. 02 2008 | Audrey Barrick

Posted on 06/03/2008 2:24:42 PM PDT by Between the Lines

A group of Southern Baptists are revisiting a controversy by calling their international missions agency to remove restrictions from candidates who speak privately in tongues and have been baptized by immersion following conversion, but was not baptized by a proper administrator or another Baptist who believes in eternal security.

Thirty-seven former Southern Baptist missionaries, former International Mission Board trustees and Southern Baptist pastors have signed a statement expressing their "strong" disagreement with a 2005 decision by the IMB trustees that ruled out the appointment of missionary candidates who practice speaking in tongues in public or a "prayer language" in private and who have not been baptized properly, according to the new guidelines.

"We are alarmed at the reports of the rejection of otherwise worthy candidates and reports of individuals who will now not even bother to apply to their own denomination’s missions organization, lest these guidelines disqualify them," the statement, which was released Monday, says. "We are dismayed that one of the results of the implementation of these guidelines is the loss of valuable, faithful IMB personnel."

"Let us as Southern Baptists not purposefully turn away any qualified worker who has heard and obeyed the call to 'Go,'" the statement reads.

The signatories argue that the International Mission Board's guidelines for candidacy stray "far beyond the parameters" set by the Southern Baptist Convention's statement of faith - the Baptist Faith and Message.

In 2005, the International Mission Board stirred debate when it adopted a policy that barred missionaries who practice private prayer language. The agency already had policies in place barring missionary candidates who practice public glossolalia (speaking in tongues) but went further to ban those who practice it in private. The adopted baptism guideline stated candidates must have been baptized in a Southern Baptist church or in a church of another denomination that practices believer's baptism by immersion alone and the administrator of the baptism must believe in eternal security.

Amid ongoing debates, IMB trustees revised the mission board's policy in May 2007, terming it "guidelines" rather than "policies." But the agency retained much of the original wording and reaffirmed the main provisions of the "guidelines."

Paul Chitwood of Kentucky, chairman of the trustees' mission personnel committee, said "the rapid spread of neo-Pentecostalism and its pressure exacted on new churches in various regions of the world warrants a concern for the clear Baptist identity of our missionary candidates."

"Furthermore, the diversity of denominational backgrounds among missionary candidates requires a clear baptism guideline to guide the work of our candidate consultants as they consider the qualification of candidates," he said at the time of the revision.

The revisions, which came after a year of review, were not made to create further controversy but rather to bring the study on the matters "to completion" and allow the agency to focus on its world mission task, Chitwood also noted.

But many Southern Baptists do not feel the matters are settled and remain concerned over the restrictions.

Signatories of the statement calling for a reversal say they are "disturbed" that the guidelines have led to "the intrusive scrutiny into the sanctity of the personal prayer closet."

"Many faithful brothers and sisters who are members of Southern Baptist churches differ on this issue as they seek to live out their lives in obedience to Christ," the statement continues. "The Bible at no point raises this issue to a matter of primary doctrinal importance, thus it should not disqualify any godly missionary candidate for service with the International Mission Board."

They further argue that the baptism guideline places the IMB board in the position of "dictating to local churches what constitutes a legitimate Christian baptism."

"With no anecdotal evidence from the field of wide-spread charismatic practices within our missionary family, and acknowledging that Southern Baptist churches are competent to judge the biblical nature of their members’ baptisms, we strongly urge Southern Baptists to seek the removal of these controversial and superfluous guidelines from use in the candidate approval process," the statement reads.

Since the new guidelines were put in place, Southern Baptists have remained divided on whether the IMB trustees acted appropriately.

Frank Cox, pastor of North Metro First Baptist Church in Lawrenceville, Ga., who is running for presidency of the Southern Baptist Convention, believes the trustees "acted in line" with their responsibility and that their action on the issue of baptism and private prayer language "was appropriate in keeping with the doctrinal integrity as to who we are as Southern Baptists," according to Baptist Press.

Meanwhile, William L. (Bill) Wagner, a former Southern Baptist missionary who is also up for SBC president this year, doesn't believe the trustees' action was appropriate.

"We have lost some wonderful missionaries because of this decision. We already have the Baptist Faith and Message document. It has served us well. We do not need to add to it," Wagner recently told Baptist Press. "I know much about this action at the IMB, and I feel that there was too much political reasoning involved in the decision. We as Baptists need to put politics aside and get back to our main task of winning people and making them disciples."

Despite disagreements, the group of signatories – which are being added to – asserted their support for the missions agency and commended the more than 5,000 IMB missionaries who have committed to spreading the Gospel.


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian
KEYWORDS: sbc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: DannyTN
One reason we believe it was a temporary gift, is the following scripture said tongues would cease.

I hear this a lot. Knowledge will also cease. Is that your position? I am amazed at this every time I hear it. I understand that which is perfect is the Bible in some eyes. The Bible is not the perfect thing, Jesus is, and when HE returns, these things will cease, not before.

41 posted on 06/05/2008 5:03:09 AM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
"Southern Baptists are basically questioning the salvation of those who weren't baptized in their clique and are bringing disunity to the body of Christ."

No we are not.

We believe the person is saved eternally, when they accept Christ before they are ever baptised. We view baptism as a testimonial ceremony of the death and resurrection and as a first act of obedience. But we don't view baptism as part of salvation. We even waive baptism for the medically impaired by membership vote.

We do believe that baptism should be full immersion like Christ was baptised by John the Baptist. But we certainly do not believe that people who were baptised less correctly aren't saved.

I think the requirement here is one of obedience. We believe in full emersion, and eternal security. If you aren't willing to be rebaptised under those conditions, then you probably aren't going to be willing to do things the Baptist way.

42 posted on 06/05/2008 8:54:41 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
"I hear this a lot. Knowledge will also cease. Is that your position? "

See my prior posts in this thread. Some knowledge has ceased. It doesn't say all knowledge will cease. It doesn't say when tongues or knowledge will cease. And it didn't say they whether or not both would occur at the same time.

Again, if you look at church history. Tongues did cease except for a controversial resurgence in the third century under Tertullian and again in the mid 1900's.

I can't tell you that tongues as practiced today is not the same as the original gift. But I have my doubts for the reasons previously expressed.

But I can say that the majority of SBC members do not believe in tongues as expressed today and do not want it practiced openly in their churches. And any missionary seeking funding from the SBC needs to comply with that.

43 posted on 06/05/2008 9:05:04 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Four Great Religious Truths:
1. Muslims do not recognize Jews as God’s Chosen People.
2. Jews do not recognize Jesus as the Son of God and the Messiah.
3. Protestants do not recognize The Pope as the leader of all Christianity.
4. Baptists do not recognize each other at liquor stores or at Hooters.


44 posted on 06/08/2008 2:21:29 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson