[papertyger]

I find it hilarious that people who have no problem whatsoever with the doctrine of the incarnation balk at the idea of transubstantiation...as if one were any less preposterous than the other.

If one is willing to embrace the doctrine of the transcendent creator becoming a man, on what basis can one deny the creator becoming ANYTHING in his creation?

The mentality is like Darwinism turned upside down; once accepted there is literally nothing its devotees think it can't accomplish, including that which is physically impossible!

[Mad Dawg]

Straining out a gnat and swallowing a very blessed camel.

[Iscool]

I find it hilarious that people who have no problem whatsoever with the doctrine of the incarnation balk at the idea of transubstantiation...as if one were any less preposterous than the other.

That's easy...One is spoken of in the inspired, written words of God...The other isn't...