I wasn’t the one trying to relate Paul and Babylon or Saddam. Maybe that is the core area of confusion.
Paul was predestined to be the writer of the majority of the New Testament and no other writer of the New Testament had the 'core' education of the OLD from which to pen the so called NEW. Hey we, you and I are about to find out just how important it is to consider that 'OLD' relevant in these days. I plan to be as prepared given how many times these New Testament writers quoted that supposed 'OLD'.
Old Saddam miscalculated in his goal to reenact old Neb the first noted king of Babylon, but hey his bricks and mortar of recreating that 'ancient' city still stand as the coalition left the majority intact. Maybe Germany can be convinced to return that Ishtar gate for some 'egg' rolling.
Now do you hold that in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female? Or do you think the male still has the superior role?
Note the context in Gal. 3:28,29 and tell me what you think.
NOT an answer to the question presented. I know the men of this age view the women as chatters to be silent and not nearly of the standing of the men.
The answer is in the context of the passage cited. Can you interpret the text?
I'm just curious whether you are searching or plain argumentative.