"And who has used any of those terms, I'm just wondering?"
You have many times on FR used similar language.
Even in this very post to me you are implying that I am a hypocrite.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Then of course there is the fact that you didnt even take the time to actually figure out whether he was, in fact, a preterist."
That's why I said "probable". But Lee N. Field corrected me.
Incidentally, why are you acting like my misidentification of Lee N. Field as a preterist is an "attack" on him? Being that you are a preterist I find that very humorous.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Its not even clear you know the difference, e.g., believing preterism (or rather amillenialism).
I do know the difference - and the similarity.
Their are similar in that they are both wrong and out of step with the Bible.
You have many times on FR used similar language. Well, now you are just plain fabricating statements. Similar is a weasel word. It allows you to claim something that is not really true while looking all pious and such.
In the future, I would suggest you be a bit more careful with your claims.
Even in this very post to me you are implying that I am a hypocrite.
Just a caution. Shall I share your private mail to me with the group?
Their are similar in that they are both wrong and out of step with the Bible.
Thats your opinion, which you are more than entitled to hold. However, we are entitled to say the same things about your erroneous belief system (without using personal pejoratives, of course).