[sevenbak]

Religion Moderator, is it appropriate for a poster to doctor a site with photoshop to add “Mormon” to this site's graphics, and give the impression this is a “Mormon” site. It very well might be, as some of the discussions on it are of an LDS nature, but it's not sanctioned by the LDS church, nor is it done by the LDS church. This poster has deliberately changed the site and is misleading the intent of the thread.

The graphic greyfoxx put up is from her photobucket site, here. http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb254/gahamm_photos/antichristiansite.jpg

The graphic on the site she posted is undoctored here:

http://www.studychristianity.com/images/logoalt.jpg

I would expect more honesty, especially in an intentionally open anti Mormon thread.

[Religion Moderator]

When the poster of an article adds his own commentary within the text - he should make it very clear that it is his commentary. I will remove the logo from the body of the article.

[svcw]

What’s the difference between the graphics?

[ejonesie22]

Irony, I love it so...

[svcw]

I would expect more honesty, especially in an intentionally open anti Mormon thread.

I would say it is not anti-lds it is PRO truth.

[greyfoxx39]

Religion Moderator, is it appropriate for a poster to doctor a site with photoshop to add “Mormon” to this site's graphics, and give the impression this is a “Mormon” site.

LOL...did you bother to take time to read the site, particularly regarding the board of advisors?

Link

They aren't hiding their connections to the mormon church, and a few seconds glancing over the listings under the heading "Doctrinal Study" tells the tale...."Premortal Existence", "Eternal Families", "Godhead/Trinity".

It very well might be, as some of the discussions on it are of an LDS nature, but it's not sanctioned by the LDS church, nor is it done by the LDS church.

Oh, we get it...it isn't canon.

This poster has deliberately changed the site and is misleading the intent of the thread.

Since I posted the thread, my intent is to show that this site, slyly named "Christian Studies" is a fraudulent attempt to present LDS theology as Christian.....nothing misleading about the "intent of the thread"!

I would expect more honesty, especially in an intentionally open anti Mormon thread.

Oh, yeah...tell me all about the "honesty" of that site.

[Elsie]

It very well might be, as some of the discussions on it are of an LDS nature, but it's not sanctioned by the LDS church, nor is it done by the LDS church.

While the BoM merely plagarizes stuff from the BIBLE, shouldn't the LDS Organization be required to say what it added as NEW STUFF?

---

FARMS and FAIRLDS are not 'connected' (wink-wink) with the MORMON church, either, but MORMONs on FR have NO problem with using what they find there to try to support the LDS religion.

[Elsie]

It very well might be, as some of the discussions on it are of an LDS nature, but it's not sanctioned by the LDS church, nor is it done by the LDS church.

Ok; I'll put up LOTS of stuff from OFFICIAL LDS sources!!

[Elsie]

Religion Moderator, is it appropriate for a poster to doctor a site with photoshop to add “Mormon” to this site's graphics, and give the impression this is a “Mormon” site.

Thinking Humans... is it appropriate for a poser to doctor a King James Version of the Holy Bible; adding “Mormon” to the cover, and give the impression that it REALLY came from the Almighty God of the Universe?.