Keep in mind that the entire “radio replies” series posted is from a radio show in the 1930s Why post outdated teachings, as if they had some current authority? Post them on a history forum.
And, in the future, a note of intent that accompanies an outdated article is a good idea.
Regardless, what's the point of these out-of-touch series that call Orthodox schizmatics and heretics if not to inflame? As Kolo said, we can reply in kind. But I think the Pope would rather hear what his flock is doing here while he is holding hands with and embracing "schizmatics and heretics."
They are seriously undemrining his work, that's what they are doing.
They are seriously undemrining his work, that's what they are doing. That's why I posted the historical note. As for posting a caveat on the date, I agree fully. While the majority of the theology taught in the 1930s is good (often more solid than what is taught today), there has been too much serious progress developed in the past 50 years on healing the schism in the Church (including beginning to resolve the filoque issue with the Creed of Nicea-Constantinople) to set stuff back here on FR.