There are many true affirmative statements that can be made with “Bible only” in them. The article presents arguments against certain specific propositions, 565-581 that are characteristic of the principle “Bible Only”, widely adopted by the Protestants since Luther. It makes no argument against any other statement that points to the unique character of the Bible. Do you have a disagreement with the article on its substance?
Just off the top of my head, I would take issue with #’s 567, 569, and 571. I have heartburn with some of the other bold print statements, and some of the regular print explanations.
I do not consider that list to be a clear representation of historic Christianity or of the ideas of the medieval reformers.