Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
I read the sentence.

You mean you read INTO it? Perhaps you need to re-read it. You will find that Jude takes full responsibility for his writing being his will and intention. He does not invoke the assistance of the Holy Spirit leading him.

Do I have to explain "inspiraion?"

How about prove it? At this point it's a conjecture yet you treat it as a matter of fact.

What do you think compelled him to write on contending for the faith when he says he wanted to write about salvation?

From what he says, it wasn't anything other than his will and intention.

Talk about gagging on gnats....

I agree. You will need at least a box of toothpicks.

Here I thought there was an obvious difference between inferring from a chain of events, and explicit declaration! Guess I need to work on my evidence building skills.

So then, according to you, the Gospels are just narratives...the real "meat" of the New Testament is to be found in the deuterocanonical works of dubious origin, because they are inspired declarations, instead of simples stories...that's not what the Church teaches either.

As for evidence building skills, how about just some evidence other than your private interpretations? :)

175 posted on 11/03/2009 7:03:51 PM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50
Apparently you DO need to have “inspiration” explained to you....
238 posted on 11/15/2009 5:30:25 PM PST by papertyger (Representation without taxation is tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson