Snort, laugh. The cut-n-paste claimed proclamation of a Pope that was debunked. Try reading the many posts to your false claim about the Dogma of the Assumption.
What denomination do you claim?
So I warble and you snort. I'm not sure of what use to put this sort of information, but thank you anyway.
The cut-n-paste claimed proclamation of a Pope that was debunked. Try reading the many posts to your false claim about the Dogma of the Assumption.
I have read them. The proclamation of a Pope that "was debunked"? You haven't done your homework. If you had, you would have known that the Decretum has been questioned by some historians and is accepted as authentic by others. But it really doesn't matter because if it is not authentic it creates another problem because then you have Pope Hormisdas reaffirming a phony decree. Not only that, but Pope Nicolas I authoritatively cites the Decree of Gelasius and attributes it to him. Why would Pope Nicolas authoritavily cite a phony decree and falsely attribute it to Pope Gelasius?
Cordially,