Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: narses; Jim Noble; Gamecock
Why twist the truth so violently when ON THE FACE OF IT my post is at total odds with your claim?

Sorry, no dice. I'm not the one twisting the truth and you can read that in your definition. It states very plainly that there are other sources of "inspired" works. Are you going to deny that?

My question would be how now do you determine if something is "inspired"? Can you tell me how this is any different than the LDS saying the Book of Mormons is inspired? Is it just because a group of people says so? Well, the Mormons have that as well.

Since you say that I'm reading this wrong, please let me know what is "inspired" and "uninspired", which is what started this conversation. It is interesting that EVEN the Council of Trent knew-although I wouldn't agree with all of their choices.

393 posted on 01/08/2010 2:23:04 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: HarleyD
Sorry, no dice.
Indeed, no dice. You twist words, you make black white and then run a victory lap. Sad.
396 posted on 01/08/2010 7:29:09 AM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson