[Paragon Defender]

Great post! Thanks for sharing this great talk. Full of divine truth.

Those of you with issues or questions should seek clarification from sources other than biased anti-Mormons such as the many that seem to reside on the freerepublic religion section of this board.

[Colofornian]

Great post! Thanks for sharing this great talk. Full of divine truth.

Why, that's sure "funny" that when 53,000 Lds missionaries go around asking people to "pray about the Book of Mormon," for some reason there's nary a verse in the BoM about women being divine.

And here the Lds Doctrine & Covenants says the Book of Mormon is the "fulness of the everlasting gospel."

Now here you'd think that degrees of glory; the ability to become a god; supposed highest-degree exaltation...would all be relevant to the Mormon gospel. I guess it's not. NONE of those things are mentioned in the Book of Mormon.

Isn't that called spiritual bait-and-switch? Asking people to pray about & accept spiritual content that isn't even present? Isn't that a form of spiritual fraud?

And where does it say in the Book of Mormon that you have to be married to be either pure, complete or be eligible to be in God's presence? If that's part of the "fulness of the everlasting gospel," what verse is it in the Book of Mormon?

If you were ever an LDS missionary, and you asked people to pray about the Book of Mormon, how were they to read & pray about something that's not there? How could they accept a "salvation proposal" when the proposal was lacking MOST of the vital details?

Don't Lds missionaries who do this engage in spiritual fraud?

[ejonesie22]

You forgot your /s tag...

[greyfoxx39]

Those of you with issues or questions should seek clarification from sources other than biased anti-Mormons such as the many that seem to reside on the freerepublic religion section of this board.

Since you appear to be so well-informed, on this "divine truth" why don't YOU post this "clarification" right here on this thread? With sources and links, please.

I would be interested in seeing a mormon rebuttal of the points in this article.

[ejonesie22]

BTW, seeing as how the most of quoted and cut and pasted information the so called “anti-mormons” post is direct from LDS sources, perhaps you can point us as well as the lurkers to these source of which you speak.

Then you can explain why LDS doctrine and other publications AREN'T good sources to learn about the LDS...

[Tennessee Nana]

What was the number of women who have been mormon prophets and presidents again ???

I keep forgeting...

[reaganaut]

Those of you with issues or questions should seek clarification from sources other than biased anti-Mormons ...

- - - - - - - - -
Well, that is amusing since the ‘antis’(and especially us ex-mos) are more likely to truth than the LDS church members are.

I know, ‘milk’ before ‘meat’, but the LDS milk is spoiled and the meat rotten.

Someone has to tell the truth about the LDS and they sure aren’t doing it.

[caww]

I did look otherwise and at length...it is still rubbish.

[SZonian]

Do you have any sources that are “unbiased”?

The source in this article is from the LdS.

How could it be considered “biased” since this information is being presented by an LdS leader ?