Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
The point is that Jesus called it the fruit of the vine. At the very least it is an equal chance that it could be either, if no other Scripture were considered.

But Jesus and His disciples were celebrating the Passover. I can't imagine, knowing the requirements of the Law, that any Jewish person would even consider consuming what he thought was blood under any circumstances, much less one in which they were required to be ceremonially clean.

At the time of the Last Supper, Jesus and His disciples were still under the Law. They could NOT have drank blood and been considered clean. This is especially true for Jesus, who was the sacrifice for our sins and was about to die for them. He HAD to be sinless and pure. He could not have defiled Himself and remained so.

So, what does the confessional work of the congregation you belong to say about the Real Presence?

In what sense? In regards to communion itself or in regards to Christ's presence when two or three are gathered together in His name without communion?

584 posted on 07/19/2010 2:28:34 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
At the time of the Last Supper, Jesus and His disciples were still under the Law

THANK YOU for posting this. It's one of those things that get pushed to the back burner somehow, and it is SO important to know.

590 posted on 07/19/2010 2:45:38 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Defending the Indefensible. The Pride of a Pawn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson