The Confession of Cyril Lucaris

The Voice ^ | 1692 | Cyril Lucaris

[the_conscience]

You choose.

[don-o]

Uh. No thanks. This is all yours. I do some crazy stuff, but there is a line.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Jiggery-popery! That was a good one, don-o. Can I steal it? Hey, it's my lifestyle!

Do you want me to make some Mystery Squash Dish for the singin'? Can I secretly slide some of my leftover yesterday casserole into a smaller dish and take that?

It gets, uh, better when it's a couple days old.

Craftily,

Mrs. Jiggery-Popery

[trisham]

Awwwwww. C’mon you two. Kiss and make up. :)

[trisham]

I’ve heard that asparagus is good for that. :)

[trisham]

LOLOL! Good night, Mrs.Jiggery-Popery! I’ll see the two of you lovebirds tomorrow. :)

[Mad Dawg]

An, an, uh, an I’ve that composh is good for ashpagarus, uh, aragapush. Yeah, thash whaddi said, arashapug.

Izzat great or wha’? Uh scyooze me.

[delacoert]

In the example, the LDS/Catholic Caucus would discuss Trinitarian belief - one side pro and one side con. Non-members would not allowed to disrupt the caucus simply because they share a belief whether for or against.

You have repeated this ideology a couple times... in a thread that attempted to implement this ideology... and it was a demonstrable failure.

It seems obvious from the get-go that a "NO <fill-in-the-blank> ALLOWED" policy is doomed to failure.

I am left wondering, who are you and what did you do with the Religion Moderator's body.

[MarkBsnr]

An, an, uh, an I’ve that composh is good for ashpagarus, uh, aragapush. Yeah, thash whaddi said, arashapug.

I trust that you'll keep your aragapush to yourself. I'm planning on some good sirloin steaks tomorrow and will arrange the marinade tonight. That reminds me, I have been involved in a thread on goats; the latest is a young lady that believes that goat farming is symbiotic between men and goats. An interesting train of thought, to be sure. I was wondering if you have any thoughts on symbiosis versus parasitism versus good old fashioned predator / prey (and the raising thereof so that we don't have to run after them through the forest with arrows and spears).

[Mad Dawg]

Lisshen: I'm jush shayin: If Ricky Lucarish, or Cereal, or whaddever hish name is, had had more parashpagus, he would have not written shtuff like this confesshion.

Wait, Imno' finish

And for thosh who shay he DIN write it, I just shay he would have not written it better than he didn't write it becaush he din't have enuff spagaragula.

I trush I make myshelf clear. An' now, if there are no further commensh, I think, uh, I think I'll go back to the composh.

I think the ideal of perfectly symbiotic livestock is a vain dream, but worth pursuing. I think pigs would work better than goats.

[Mad Dawg]

I wunner if the Ruhlishion Mod, uh, Rodemator's body ish inna composh.

You wanna go look? I'll jush wait here until the forum shtops shpinnin'.

[svcw]

,-)

[delacoert]

I went and looked, all the trinitarians were asleep or unconscious or something, but there were two unitarians talking to a dietitian.

[Elsie]

This Caucus...

Uh...

I don 't see this designator...

---

They just can’t help themselves. Please remove post.

Since it's still here; I assume that it is NOT a CAUCUS thread.

[Elsie]

Instead, the non-members might post a similar article as "open" - or wait at least four hours and post the same article as "open."

Where the original folks on the FIRST thread may, or may not, show up!

---

(It's hard to get a WIN/WIN on this subject; ain't it! ;^)

[Religion Moderator]

You have repeated this ideology a couple times... in a thread that attempted to implement this ideology... and it was a demonstrable failure.

The article was found inappropriate for a Protestant/Orthodox Caucus because Chapter 10 is a thinly-veiled reference to Papal Primacy.

If an appropriate article had been used, the caucus would not have been broken.

[delacoert]

If an appropriate article had been used, the caucus would not have been broken.

Please point me to a successful caucus-cut-out caucus thread?

I understand devotional, denominational caucus, ecumenical, open and nondenominational threads, but I seriously question the sanity of a proposal for a forum that is intended to gerrymander out a group that would be specifically and acutely interested in the thread topic.

[Religion Moderator]

Every caucus cuts non-members out of the discussion.

[delacoert]

Every caucus cuts non-members out of the discussion.

So are you admitting there is no example of a gerrymander caucus thread?