To: hiho hiho
The caption below the picture attached to the article explains the scene, but here it is again. A young boy, dying from famine, is trying to crawl to a UN food station about a kilometer away. He isn't going to make it, and a vulture is stalking him. So, it's somehow God's fault that the photographer would rather get a Pulitzer prize than actually stop to carry that child to the feeding station?
7 posted on
08/27/2010 9:30:45 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
“So, it’s somehow God’s fault that the photographer would rather get a Pulitzer prize than actually stop to carry that child to the feeding station?”
Photog was an atheist.
18 posted on
08/27/2010 9:44:20 PM PDT by
jessduntno
(Each day, I await a fresh insult to America by this usurper...he never fails to deliver.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
“So, it’s somehow God’s fault that the photographer would rather get a Pulitzer prize than actually stop to carry that child to the feeding station?”
I would have taken the photo. Then carried the child to the aid station.
25 posted on
08/27/2010 9:51:49 PM PDT by
BigCinBigD
(Northern flags in South winds flutter...)
To: Blood of Tyrants
So, it's somehow God's fault that the photographer would rather get a Pulitzer prize than actually stop to carry that child to the feeding station? What is it about journalists that they feel they must remain impartial observers (unless a Democrat is running for office) above the fray of life?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson