Right vig, and why not ask the question WHY. Oh, that involves THEOLOGY things you don't want to address. Just as long as they say they believe in Jesus all is well is it?
Actually vig, you are the example of top down by your effort to silence the opinions of TN. Tell us - Christian fundamentalist - the fundamental definition of who Christ is; the nature of God/Trinity - and tell us is that what Mr. Beck believes in as a mormon? On the basis of WHAT Mr. Christian Fundamentalist, can you condemn the identification that mormonism is not Christian (besides the fact that most Christian denominations hold the same view).
See TN and myself are able to relate on the level of ideas, doctrines and scriptural standards for definitions as well as trying to point out the errors of mormonism (as well as other non-Christian religions). Vig likes to try to silence the debate by using emotionally laden adjectives such as 'taliban'.
Is the mormon "Jesus" who had to prove himself 'worthy' to become a god and the ontological brother of satan the same Jesus of Christian Fundamentalism? It would be interesting to see you clarify yourself for once.
I'm simply pointing out, as so many other have more eloquently than me have done, that Jesus Christ will ultimately decide who is and who is not Christian.
Not the Taliban wing of the Christian fundamentalists. And if the term insults you, it is only because it fits.
The fact of the matter is that our civilization is in a fight for our very survival against the forces of evil who would deny us all freedom of religion or anything else.
And presented with the choice of fighting alongside people who agree with fundamentalist Christianity on 80% to 98% of what we believe or fragging them, TFC's repeatedly choose fragging over cooperation.
Nothing has made that clearer than the Glenn Beck threads. If the TFC's really wanted to discuss theology, they would go to theological threads or entire websites devoted to that purpose.
You can decide where the percentage is between 2% and 20%, but you've made it clear that you are more interested in fragging a supposed enemy who does not agree with you sufficiently on theology rather than cooperating with them against a real enemy who would destroy our entire civilization if left unchecked.
It is a good thing your kind was not around when the Catholic Church alone beat back the Muslim invaders in Europe because they probably wouldn't have been sufficiently theologically pure enough to suit you either.