To: NYer
IMO the headline is misleading. He didn't say
"science" becomes "dangerously narrow", he said a "scientific
outlook" becomes "dangerously narrow".
He's talking about a personal worldview. It's a broader perspective that better informs a person.
3 posted on
09/17/2010 11:29:42 AM PDT by
Varda
To: Varda
Science is always pushing the envelope of what is possible, without the guidance of what is moral or ethical it is likely to go astray.
Vivisection on living subjects is one example, but the Germans and Japanese already did that.
6 posted on
09/17/2010 12:31:26 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(Liberals are educated above their level of intelligence.. Thanks Sr. Angelica)
To: Varda
In other words, scientism becomes dangerously narrow. It is a competing religion.
9 posted on
09/18/2010 9:43:48 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson