To: Stourme
It is curious that you try this post, as if you would defend the Bible having three different but not contradictory accounts of Saul on the way to Damascus. But approximately six hours later, you try to imply the Bible is not to be trusted because there are three different accounts, and you assert that they are contradictory accounts! [
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2598634/posts?page=852#852]
Mormonism apologists are certainly a peculiar twisting and deceitful bunch. BTW, the three accounts are not at all contradictory, as two posters showed to you in response to your specious accusation regarding the Bible.
64 posted on
10/10/2010 6:44:55 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: ejonesie22; Elsie; greyfoxx39; Colofornian; Godzilla; Osage Orange; caww; Tennessee Nana
I thought y’all might find this an interesting duplicity for an ardent LDS apologist ...
65 posted on
10/10/2010 8:00:17 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MHGinTN; Stourme
It is curious that you try this post, as if you would defend the Bible having three different but not contradictory accounts of Saul on the way to Damascus. But approximately six hours later, you try to imply the Bible is not to be trusted because there are three different accounts, and you assert that they are contradictory accounts! [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2598634/posts?page=852#852] Most interesting MHG. well stormy - you can't have it both ways what DO you believe.
68 posted on
10/10/2010 8:38:18 PM PDT by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: MHGinTN
you deserve both yourself!
72 posted on
10/10/2010 10:10:59 PM PDT by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson