To: Cronos; RnMomof7
RnMomof7: The ark is a type of CHRIST
Metmom (reply to a different post of Rn’s): Doesn’t that make us all arks of the covenant?
Cronos: Take those two statements — now either you, M, disagree with R’s first statement or if you agree, then, your logic states that “us all” are types of Christ. Is that your logic, M?
***************************************************************************************
See what quote mining will get you?
204 posted on
12/16/2010 6:04:47 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom; RnMomof7
RnMomof7: The ark is a type of CHRIST
Metmom (reply to a different post of Rn’s): Doesn’t that make us all arks of the covenant?
Take those two statements — now either you, M, disagree with R’s first statement or if you agree, then, your logic states that “us all” are types of Christ. Is that your logic, M? It's quite simple -- you can say "No" or "yes" -- there's no harm if you disagree with Rn's statement that the Ark is a type of Christ
215 posted on
12/16/2010 6:21:22 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
To: metmom; RnMomof7
RnMomof7: The ark is a type of CHRIST
Metmom (reply to a different post of Rn’s): Doesn’t that make us all arks of the covenant?
Cronos: Take those two statements — now either you, M, disagree with R’s first statement or if you agree, then, your logic states that “us all” are types of Christ. Is that your logic, M?
489 posted on
12/17/2010 5:06:14 AM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson