Cronos, is that the best argument you can muster, that someone reads the Book of Acts and understands that the disciples (as well as Jesus who kept the Law perfectly) were Jews under Jewish Law, a law that forbade the eating of blood of any kind, certainly that of another human?
“
You, metmom and others may find the following useful:
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/quickquestions/keyword/Jehovahs%20Witness
Note the quick question that states, “Q:“
Jehovah’s Witnesses told me that Jesus’ commands to eat his flesh and drink his blood in John 6 could not be literal because Jesus would be advocating something against God’s law by commanding us to eat blood (cf. Gen. 9:4, Acts 15:28-29). What can I say to this?
””