Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator

But this title wasn’t a “shot” at other groups of believers, by the definition of caucus threads. I thought the rules made it clear that the fact that a particular religious belief contradicted another religion’s belief did not make it an attack on that other religion.

Certainly, there are caucus threads where specific beliefs of specific denominations are in the title, beliefs which other denominations find rediculous or even offensive. But that doesn’t make them ineligible for caucus designation, right?


660 posted on 01/03/2011 11:22:46 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
The title (or article content) can be inflammatory enough that the thread is ineligible for a caucus.

For instance, if an Buddhist caucus were to post an article titled "Jesus should have packed heat" it would be inflammatory enough that the caucus protection would be removed.

742 posted on 01/03/2011 12:16:54 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
But this title wasn’t a “shot” at other groups of believers.......

Really...??? Are you really serious?

A thread titled..."J. Smith...an Apostle of Jesus Christ"...isn't a "shot" at Christians????????????

Seems clear enough to me....

781 posted on 01/03/2011 12:40:03 PM PST by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson