i’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, you may not realize what i am referring to. the charge was made that the Catholic Church teaches that Jesus is killed again at each Mass. Cronos has done terrific work showing this is FALSE, that the Church teaches Jesus died ONCE. Hebrews would not have been accepted as canonical if the Church taught differently. his post agreed the Catechism teaches Jesus died Once, so that ends it. the False charge was exposed as a lie.
“i’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, you may not realize what i am referring to. the charge was made that the Catholic Church teaches that Jesus is killed again at each Mass. Cronos has done terrific work showing this is FALSE, that the Church teaches Jesus died ONCE. Hebrews would not have been accepted as canonical if the Church taught differently. his post agreed the Catechism teaches Jesus died Once, so that ends it. the False charge was exposed as a lie.”
No need to do that; my response was to point out that you were not quoting caww’s statement in its entirety and trying to make a “QED” statement. Your statement above makes no sense. Go back and read what caww said; look at what you quoted and the false conclusion that is drawn. Then re-read my post. It has nothing to do with a “false charge.” It has to do with the need to quote people’s statements completely.
But, since you raise it, the whole false doctrine of the Mass has been debunked here quite thoroughly by many wonderful, ACCURATE appeals to SCRIPTURE, not the false doctrines of “tradition.”
Thanks anyway.
Hoss
Cronos copied and pasted and didn't attribute. It was not terrific and not much work.
As a matter of fact, such action could easily be construed as plagiarism, since with no cite he left us to conclude that that was his own work. It effectively destroys any credibility that he may have had left.