>>>>re: You’re the one insisting that it’s heresy, remember? You’re the one calling even Benedict a heretic. <<<<
>>Please copy and paste in italics my exact words, when you accuse me of saying something. If not, it is called detraction. <<
How’s this:
>>>>”... all 5 Vatican II popes are not even Catholic. Pope St. Pius X would have excommunicated all five before they even became bishops.”<<<<
Play all the stupid games you want. It’s called deceit.
I stand by what I wrote above. However, you state that I called B16 or JPII heretics, which I didn't. If I called them heretics, I would have to prove it, and that's very difficult for me to prove, same as to prove that Vat II contains heresies. Besides, I have no authority to enforce the charge.
Your calling “playing stupid” and deceitful is detraction. This is a complicated matter as both JPII and B16 are progressivists. The progressivist never says outright anything heretical that is not duplicitous, that can't be interpreted some "orthodox" way. I've learned over the years not to go that route. I'll let the proper authorities, the popes of the future judge them. You, just like the sedevacantes ( who make the same arguments against me, from the other side) make things simple in your minds, because this is a difficult matter, that you can't comprehend. I on the other hand do not presume to understand.
However, I will say again that “Pope St. Pius X would have excommunicated all five before they even became bishops”.