From the article:- “The news story by the Associated Press speaks of priests who “rape and molest children,” referring to them as “pedophile priests.” It is factually wrong: few were raped, most were not children, and pedophilia is not the problem.”
You wrote:- “Wow, that is an absolute lie and easily disprovable by the Church’s own reports. This just re-victimizes the children over again to say they were not ‘raped’ by priests. Is the Catholic League now saying that children can chose who they sleep with since its not considered ‘rape’ by them?”
Why did you write as if these ACCUSATIONS were actually real stats?
Why are you so determined not to post the link from #8?
Now, I’m sure you have stats from other denominations, right? Can you link us to them?
WaterBoard, I’m afraid you will need to go to some posters and personally read them report.
But it won’t do any good. Some prefer to defend their church by squeezing their eyes shut and pretending it hasn’t happened. It is hard to read when you eyes are shut.
From the article:- “The news story by the Associated Press speaks of priests who “rape and molest children,” referring to them as “pedophile priests.” It is factually wrong: few were raped, most were not children, and pedophilia is not the problem.”
You wrote:- “Wow, that is an absolute lie and easily disprovable by the Church’s own reports. This just re-victimizes the children over again to say they were not ‘raped’ by priests. Is the Catholic League now saying that children can chose who they sleep with since its not considered ‘rape’ by them?”
Why did you write as if these ACCUSATIONS were actually real stats?
Why are you so determined not to post the link from #8?
Now, I’m sure you have stats from other denominations, right? Can you link us to them?
Why are you avoiding this post? Why don’t you post the link where you got these FALSE stats you posted in #8? Your contortions to make them fit the PDF review is a nasty bit of work. They were ACCUSATIONS and ALLEGATIONS taken from multiple pages and pasted together to make it look like a actual study using the Bishop Conference Review as your source knowing there’d be no consequences. Who would question your claims? You’re too used to leftist sites who accept anything against truth so long as it fits the narrative. This works on comment sections on all manner of sites, such as, lefties sites like dailykos, Media Matters, etc., or headlined on “The Pope is the anti-Christ and we’re all whores of Babylon” sites, as well as Muslim sites but not here on FR.
Now post the link!
Disclaimer: I already know the sites.
Natural Law - I thought I was talking to a leftie from Media Matters but now know I was talking to a Soros bought and paid “catholic” operative, no difference, the left, seeking truth, bizarrely finds itself in the business of chronic self-deception and reinterpretation of reality to fit their expectations thus satisfied they whore it throughout the net. The Gospel is not a creation of human mind but God’s message concerning the reality of man and the universe. Catholics seek truth with reason and he’s nowhere close.