[daniel1212]

It has to do with comprehension, or a tendency to fail to read carefully, and supposes that nothing was said regarding as to why some things Rome says can be considered as infallible truth, while we both allow some disagreement in other things, and on what tends to characterizes those who deny the core truths we both agree on. But at least you showed you read some.

[Cronos]

Rot, as I said clearly, most don't read your posts thinking they are flashy and long and may have content, but if anyone DOES read it, they will see that your posts have ZERO content and are all flashy, long words but no facts, or contain half-truths repeated in language meant to be obscure

your posts have been refuted before and shown to be basically conflations or utterly incorrect -- all flash and no content.