[Godzilla]

If you are so sure about that, then you should be able to prove everything that you are here claiming. Where can those handwritten documents be viewed? Who were the handwriting experts that testified that that they could not have been forgeries? Were did you learn of their existence, if they actually exist?

I cited the sources along with the materials John should you desire to research further. Many are in the LDS archives, most are cited and copied in numerous other books by historians - lds and non-lds, both pro and counter mormonism John. To date - none have been found to be frauds or forgeries - so go seek out your own experts and challenge John, because it is the judgement of the historian community that the documents are valid and are widely accepted as being authentic.

[John McDonnell]

I cited the sources along with the materials John should you desire to research further.

No you didn't. You were extremely vague about what you claimed. Your whole approach has been to throw out bits and pieces without giving full sources for any of it, apparently hoping that the sheer volume of the bits and pieces will make it look like your position is solid, when it is not.

[reaganaut]

I cited the sources along with the materials John should you desire to research further. Many are in the LDS archives,

- - - -
I viewed a couple of them (along with many other primary sources) when I was doing my research in SLC. They exist and analysts have authenticated them.