Not a sound argument. Why should we have to assume that all religions are equally good, effective, useful, etc.?
I don’t find Mormons threatening in any way. Some Muslims, on the other hand...
I can list wacky,strange,unorthodox aspects of almost every single religion. I can list dozens about that guy's including going into the closet or behind closed doors to drink.
It is foolish, pick on the man's liberal policies and flip flops,not on his religion, or pretty soon all our beliefs will be picked on and not by just the heathens of the radical left and media Communists.
Be careful for what you wish for..........
I don't assume that. As it happens, my religion is very nearly the perfect truth, which makes it slightly better than most other branches of Christianity, much better than several other religions, and incomparably better than a couple of alleged religions that disgust me. Neither my faith nor Mitt's would be relevant to Mitt's campaign. Romney would, regardless of faith, be a terrible, horrible, awful president, only slightly better than Pelosi. It's his political views, not his faith that should doom his candidacy.
I do not think it is a positive for conservatism to focus on LDS church quirks. The media are playing this game, focusing on Mitt's faith, to make us look bad to moderates, just as they ignored Obama's much stranger faith to avoid making him look bad. We should focus on real issues, which are deadly to Mitt, rather than allowing them to sidetrack us.
'Cause I say so!!!