Why do you think it is a "favorite" with Protestants? Do we not celebrate the Lord's Supper with broken unleavened bread and grape juice? Do we not say first that everyone should examine himself before he partakes of the elements? Do we not speak the same words Jesus said to his disciples, this is my body which is broken for you, take and eat of it in remembrance of me? Do we not also take the cup and repeat the words of Jesus, this cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me. For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lords death until he comes?
And do we not do this many times during the year, not just at Easter? Do we not preach that to participate unworthily is a sin? That no one should partake who has not received the Lord Jesus Christ as his Savior? The true life-giving nature of Jesus' flesh and blood is in the fact that he died for our sins upon the cross. His body was broken for us, his blood shed for our sins and without his sacrifice we would be without hope in a dying world full of sin. He also rose again from the grave so that we know our sin debt is paid. If Christ be not risen, we are dead in our sins, Paul said. And because he is risen, so shall we be raised spotless and unblemished, clothed in the righteousness of Christ.
As I have said before, Jvette, it is not so much that some want to believe that the elements are spiritually changed - spiritually because the elements remain bread and wine - into the actual flesh and blood of Jesus, but that they insist that all must partake of this sacrament in order to be saved. That no one who has not received Christ, believed on him, can be saved, I fully accept because it is Biblical truth. What I object to most of all is the dogma that this observance itself is propitiatory. Paul said as often as you do this, you do "show the Lord's death until he comes". That no one was supposed to partake who was not already a believer, is plain, so why would Paul imply - which I don't believe he ever did - that the repeated partaking was what saved one?
Jesus died once for all, Scripture says, and Jesus is in heaven at the right hand of the Father until he comes again. He sacrifice was complete, "it is finished", he said, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sin. It does not need to be repeated again and again, because by one offering he has perfected forever those who are saved. We, by faith, receive him and we are found IN CHRIST. God counts his righteousness in the place of our righteousness and we are perfected in his sight. We are justified and sanctified by grace through faith and we have eternal life through Jesus Christ. The observance of the Eucharist was for thanksgiving, for remembrance, for reminding the saved what Jesus did for them so that we are encouraged to share our faith and to live righteous and holy lives through the power of grace through Christ.
grape juice????
:)
Amen and Amen!!!
Preach it sister......
“but that they insist that all must partake of this sacrament in order to be saved”
John 6:53Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
I think protestants like the passage you gave because it seems to support their rejection of the Catholic Church.
I don’t doubt your sincerity, boatbums. From all you said in your post, you’re almost there:)
Jesus did not ever make a disclaimer to the words He spoke in John 6 and on the night before He died, He showed the Apostles how this “hard saying” would come to be.