Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH
EWTN ^ | Dr. William Marshner

Posted on 12/11/2011 5:59:43 PM PST by rzman21

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-326 next last
To: RegulatorCountry; Judith Anne

You didn’t ping Judith Anne because you didn’t mention her. BUT you said CATHOLICS said Paul was crazy. The reality is that if you were on the thread in question you would have known that it was Judith Anne and Judith Anne only who took issue with Paul.

Perhaps you were on the original thread, I don’t know. You may have just been repeating the mischaracterization about Catholics (plural) opinion of Paul. So perhaps you’re only guilty of repeating an untruth told by a virulent anti-Catholic poster here.

So now that we’re clear here perhaps you can clarify your postion. We’re you on the original thread in question? Or did you just repeat someone’s accusation about what Catholics feel about Paul?

It could be an honest mistake on your part.

I find the rest of your post and accusations baffling. I pointed out an error you made. You make no mention of your error. You try and tell me all the nasty thing Catholics have said. Is your point 2 wrongs make a right?? Can you acknowledge you were in error saying Catholics (plural) said Paul was crazy? Your other issues about things Catholics have said that you find hurtful are a red herring to why I addressed you in the first place.

As for your comments about Catholics being “unbiblical” etc., those are your OPINIONS. As for your question about “Paulicians”, that’s a far, far, far cry from Catholics calling Paul crazy. That’s more of a theological debate between Catholics and some Protestants as to how much weight is put into Paul’s writings as opposed to other writers. Again, a red herring and nothing to do with what I initially asked you about, your mischaracterization that you have seen CATHOLICS (plural) call Paul crazy. Which by the way would be impossible because we’ve established only one poster went that far, so you can’t attest to seeing something posted here that never happened.

So, I’ll ask you again.

Were you repeating someone else untruth about Catholics calling Paul crazy?

Or

We’re you on the original thread where you knew it was one person’s opinion and figured you could use that persons opinion and try to insinuate that that was what “Catholics” believe as a dagger to damage Catholics and the Catholic Church?


281 posted on 12/20/2011 6:33:54 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Having been subjected to your clergy through to adulthood as you’ve obviously been, it strikes me that you’re looking in all the wrong places, MarkBsnr.


282 posted on 12/20/2011 6:34:49 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

>>>>>I watched for it and sure enough I saw this tactic used by the usual suspects

Almost every single one of them.

_____

Pretty much. If our non Catholics friends can’t be honest in their characterizations and debating tactics, how much credence should we give to anything they post?

These are Christians? Using blatant and knowing deception?


283 posted on 12/20/2011 6:51:41 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Having been subjected to your clergy through to adulthood as you’ve obviously been, it strikes me that you’re looking in all the wrong places, MarkBsnr.

That is, strike out.


284 posted on 12/20/2011 7:26:55 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

>>>>I’ve also seen people deride the very Biblical description of Jesus Christ as the Second Adam, calling it some crazy Protestant idea. That was Judith Anne, too, but there are others who have implied as much. I’ve also been told I’ll be judged by the pope when I die.

Both tose statements are false, and now I have lost all respect for you due to your lack of integrity. I see no reason for ANY Catholic to ever try to have an honest conversation with someone who is known to spread falsehoods so lavishly,


285 posted on 12/20/2011 7:59:37 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

They’re not false statements as I’ve said to you before, Judith Anne.


286 posted on 12/20/2011 8:01:10 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Prove it.


287 posted on 12/20/2011 8:01:37 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Say it as many times as you want, Christ will judge you.


288 posted on 12/20/2011 8:11:30 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Say it as many times as you want, Christ will judge you.

As he will you, Judith Anne.

289 posted on 12/20/2011 8:34:48 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Yes, and I am not afraid of Him.


290 posted on 12/20/2011 8:36:53 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Yes, and I am not afraid of Him.

It does seem rather evidently true that you're not a God-fearing woman, Judith Anne.

291 posted on 12/20/2011 8:45:40 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

1John 4:18


292 posted on 12/21/2011 3:41:07 AM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Careful, you might end up inadvertantly condemning your own church once again.


293 posted on 12/21/2011 3:44:08 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Rnmom has repeatedly demonstrated that as a former Catholic, she has no clue about Catholicism.

She ain't the only one.

294 posted on 12/21/2011 4:04:18 AM PST by Hacksaw (I don't hate Mormons. Is that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw; RnMomof7
Rnmom has repeatedly demonstrated that as a former Catholic, she has no clue about Catholicism.

She ain't the only one.

Roger that.

295 posted on 12/21/2011 8:23:44 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob; RegulatorCountry; metmom; TSgt
Sorry, ONE, and only one Catholic had an issue with Paul and got no agreements with any other Catholics. I saw the thread where it happened.

Wrong. There were more. And no, no not one Catholic called the offenders on their Paul issues. The silence was deafening.

296 posted on 12/21/2011 11:32:25 AM PST by Gamecock (I am so thankful for [the] active obedience of Christ. No hope without it. JGM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Wrong, one, and only one.

Show me where any other Catholic called Paul crazy.


297 posted on 12/21/2011 11:39:38 AM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Judith Anne
Wrong. There were more. And no, no not one Catholic called the offenders on their Paul issues. The silence was deafening.

Judith Anne and I had a long discussion about it.

298 posted on 12/21/2011 3:34:11 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Oh?

In public or in private?


299 posted on 12/21/2011 4:25:33 PM PST by Gamecock (I am so thankful for [the] active obedience of Christ. No hope without it. JGM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

How is that your concern?


300 posted on 12/21/2011 4:51:28 PM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson