Posted on 12/11/2011 5:59:43 PM PST by rzman21
You didn’t ping Judith Anne because you didn’t mention her. BUT you said CATHOLICS said Paul was crazy. The reality is that if you were on the thread in question you would have known that it was Judith Anne and Judith Anne only who took issue with Paul.
Perhaps you were on the original thread, I don’t know. You may have just been repeating the mischaracterization about Catholics (plural) opinion of Paul. So perhaps you’re only guilty of repeating an untruth told by a virulent anti-Catholic poster here.
So now that we’re clear here perhaps you can clarify your postion. We’re you on the original thread in question? Or did you just repeat someone’s accusation about what Catholics feel about Paul?
It could be an honest mistake on your part.
I find the rest of your post and accusations baffling. I pointed out an error you made. You make no mention of your error. You try and tell me all the nasty thing Catholics have said. Is your point 2 wrongs make a right?? Can you acknowledge you were in error saying Catholics (plural) said Paul was crazy? Your other issues about things Catholics have said that you find hurtful are a red herring to why I addressed you in the first place.
As for your comments about Catholics being “unbiblical” etc., those are your OPINIONS. As for your question about “Paulicians”, that’s a far, far, far cry from Catholics calling Paul crazy. That’s more of a theological debate between Catholics and some Protestants as to how much weight is put into Paul’s writings as opposed to other writers. Again, a red herring and nothing to do with what I initially asked you about, your mischaracterization that you have seen CATHOLICS (plural) call Paul crazy. Which by the way would be impossible because we’ve established only one poster went that far, so you can’t attest to seeing something posted here that never happened.
So, I’ll ask you again.
Were you repeating someone else untruth about Catholics calling Paul crazy?
Or
We’re you on the original thread where you knew it was one person’s opinion and figured you could use that persons opinion and try to insinuate that that was what “Catholics” believe as a dagger to damage Catholics and the Catholic Church?
Having been subjected to your clergy through to adulthood as you’ve obviously been, it strikes me that you’re looking in all the wrong places, MarkBsnr.
>>>>>I watched for it and sure enough I saw this tactic used by the usual suspects
Almost every single one of them.
_____
Pretty much. If our non Catholics friends can’t be honest in their characterizations and debating tactics, how much credence should we give to anything they post?
These are Christians? Using blatant and knowing deception?
That is, strike out.
>>>>I’ve also seen people deride the very Biblical description of Jesus Christ as the Second Adam, calling it some crazy Protestant idea. That was Judith Anne, too, but there are others who have implied as much. I’ve also been told I’ll be judged by the pope when I die.
Both tose statements are false, and now I have lost all respect for you due to your lack of integrity. I see no reason for ANY Catholic to ever try to have an honest conversation with someone who is known to spread falsehoods so lavishly,
They’re not false statements as I’ve said to you before, Judith Anne.
Prove it.
Say it as many times as you want, Christ will judge you.
As he will you, Judith Anne.
Yes, and I am not afraid of Him.
It does seem rather evidently true that you're not a God-fearing woman, Judith Anne.
1John 4:18
Careful, you might end up inadvertantly condemning your own church once again.
She ain't the only one.
She ain't the only one.
Roger that.
Wrong. There were more. And no, no not one Catholic called the offenders on their Paul issues. The silence was deafening.
Wrong, one, and only one.
Show me where any other Catholic called Paul crazy.
Judith Anne and I had a long discussion about it.
Oh?
In public or in private?
How is that your concern?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.