Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

“That wouldn’t make Nero the beast of Revelation though.” — hmmm... well I don’t think it would affect that — Nero, the beast would still be the beast.


106 posted on 12/23/2011 7:19:23 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
"Nero, the beast would still be the beast."

Beasts who have been dead for 50 years don't really pose much of a threat. Also Paul, who was never afraid to name names, never put forth Nero (or any Roman) as the Man of Lawlessness. Finally several texts of Revelation, including the earliest one we have, put the mark of the Beast as 616 rather than 666. But, putting a name on the Beast has been favorite Christian parlour game for eons and that's not gonig to stop.

108 posted on 12/23/2011 7:26:55 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson