BTW, that "family" was chased out of India about 200 AD and went back home.
When we know a historic person and someone says he was conceived by an elephant, it is necessary to reject that belief as untrue ~ and totally irrelevant ~ just crazy talk by ignorant people on a level with the stupid rulings by mullahs out in the desert.
An example ~ I have a book about the use of a mildly hallucinogenic mushroom (amanita muscaria) where the writer deduces that instead of Jesus being a real person the Apostles were into using this mushroom. He even cites scripture to support his argument.
Obviously that belief is not part of Christianity.
So you disagree with the historically accurate version of Buddha but accept the new age watered down version.
OK, doesn’t change anything about the religion. It does display your willful ignorance of the subject.
Buddha was born into a privileged family, the son of a king. He spent most of his time stoned which is where he got his deep thoughts.