Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
This would be similar to the philosophies propounded by iscool or Uri'el.

Ten thousand other expressions witness to the human race that they should not think that it was the godhead of the Son that was recently killed but the flesh which was joined to the nature of the godhead. (Hence also Christ calls himself the lord and son of David: “ ‘What do you think of the Christ ? Whose son is he ?’ They said to him, ‘The son of David.’ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘How is it then that David inspired by the Spirit, calls him Lord, saying, “The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand”?’”. He said this as being indeed son of David according to the flesh, but his Lord according to his godhead.) The body therefore is the temple of the deity of the Son, a temple which is united to it in a high and divine conjunction, so that the divine nature accepts what belongs to the body as its own.

First off, it makes absolutely no difference what a person thinks or believes about it...It doesn't affect a person's salvation one way or the other...

But yes, I believe Nestorius' position is the biblical one...

Php 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Php 2:8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

'Form' can be translated as nature...Verse 6 says Jesus had the nature of God while verse 7 says Jesus also had the nature of a servant and ultimately, the flesh...

But regardless, are you contending as Nestorius accused that the God-head died??? Is the God-head separable enough that one part of it can die???

I don't think so...But one thing is for sure and that is that Jesus had a human, corrupt body in the flesh...It could die obviously...It could and did age with time...

THAT body died...And then it was changed...It apparently was still a physical body to a degree, or when called upon to be a physical body, it certainly isn't the old corruptible flesh that Jesus was born with...

Whatever the physical Jesus was before he died is not at all the same physical Jesus that resurrected...

But I am satisfied that Nestorius had a good understanding of the scriptures when he wrote on the subject...Jesus temporarily had a human body and it was supernaturally somehow joined to the divinity of the God-head...I don't need to know how or why...

10 posted on 01/10/2012 6:04:17 AM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool

Yet he was condemmed as being a heretic.


11 posted on 01/10/2012 6:18:02 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool; metmom; RnMomof7; caww; Mr Rogers; one Lord one faith one baptism; smvoice; ...
Iscool: .Jesus temporarily had a human body and it was supernaturally somehow joined to the divinity of the God-head

Iscool: Whatever the physical Jesus was before he died is not at all the same physical Jesus that resurrected.

ok, thank you for sharing your views.

12 posted on 01/10/2012 6:53:23 AM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson