Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
And that’s what your crew is saying on this very thread.

as well as elsewhere- catch up with the world RF

Who objected to this? Certainly not me.

Right, only apart from accusing everyone who chose to apply that criteria antiAmerican and a liberal

It’s your team that says that Mormons - simply for the act of being mormon should not be running for office. You’ve found the problem, and it’s your friends.

There you go again. You just contradicted yourself. You are objecting to citizens using what ever standard they choose - to which you said Who objected to this? Certainly not me.

Yep, fail RF - inconsistant in your own words.

410 posted on 03/09/2012 7:37:45 PM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla

“Yep, fail RF - inconsistant in your own words.”

No. You want to choose approved religions, I don’t.

If you wish to use whatever criteria you wish to use in the voting booth, that is your choice as a free American.

However, if you wish to say, as you have, that someone who meets the Constitutional requirement for running for office who happens to be a member of one of your unapproved religions is not fit to run for office - then that is repugnant and un-American.

You reek of your own fail.

Just because you have friends who are equally deluded as you does not make you right. You are most certainly wrong.


411 posted on 03/09/2012 7:43:40 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson