To: trisham
Unless I’m mistaken, unless the pope is speaking ex cathedra, even Catholics are not obligated to agree with the pope.
230 posted on
02/23/2012 3:36:20 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: metmom
Yes, but any reasonable person should be obligated to agree that the Pope is a Christian and the leader of one of the single largest Christian organizations on Earth.
232 posted on
02/23/2012 3:39:57 PM PST by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: metmom; wagglebee
Unless I’m mistaken, unless the pope is speaking ex cathedra, even Catholics are not obligated to agree with the pope.***************************
With all due respect, that's not the issue here. The issue is Darwinism, and how it has been an evil influence on our culture.
233 posted on
02/23/2012 3:50:02 PM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: metmom; trisham; Alamo-Girl
The pope can ONLY speak infallibly on matters of faith and morals, NOT science.
All any pope has ever said about evolution is that CERTAIN ASPECTS of it may be valid. It is without question that animals adapt to their native climates, it is necessary for them to avoid extinction. However, no pope has EVER suggested that humans "evolved" from any other animal. After all, why would they, all evolutionists can point to is some totally unidentifiable "missing link." Logic would dictate that if this "missing link" actually existed that archeologists would have stumbled upon it by now.
234 posted on
02/23/2012 3:54:00 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson