I actually cited real history, contained in a real book, something you have no knowledge of and did not even attempt to refute.
Hitler was a Creationist who believed in fixed kinds and that his race was in the image of God. Mein Kamph made many references to his belief in fixed kinds and his race being created “in the image of God”.
Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory of evolution in favor of Lysenko and a Lamarkian mechanism. Far from recommending Darwin - Stalin would have anyone teaching Darwin arrested. Do you have any source for your assertion that Stalin “pushed” Darwin's theory or writing on anyone - recommended it as reading material?
Is there any difference in your mind between Lamarkian-ism and Darwin-ism?
Hitler was a Creationist.
Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory.
Eugenics is based upon a misunderstanding of evolution much as Socialism is based upon a misunderstanding of free markets - based upon the same delusion - that a “central planner” knows what “the market” will want better than millions of independent actors acting in their own self interest.
I know that Creationists have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for arguments - this article is a claptrap of appeal to consequences and guilt by association. Moreover the assoication is constructed via complete historic ignorance.
Hitler was a Creationist who believed in fixed kinds and that his race was in the image of the God that created it.
Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory in favor of Lysenko and a Lamarkian mechanism.
You can argue against the above two FACTS as much as you want - but all it does is make you look ignorant and deranged.
wagglebee, you are witnessing the default knee jerk reaction of any evolutionist when confronted by facts he can't dispute. Anyone who disagrees with the opinion of an evo is an *ignorant creationist*.
End of story.
That's all they have in their arsenal.
You can discount the importance of eugenics all you want, but the FACT still remains that it is at the core of Darwinism. The Darwin family DEVELOPED IT.
I know that Creationists have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for arguments - this article is a claptrap of appeal to consequences and guilt by association. Moreover the assoication is constructed via complete historic ignorance.
Why are evolutionists so adverse to discussing eugenics?
Hitler was a Creationist who believed in fixed kinds and that his race was in the image of the God that created it.
Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory in favor of Lysenko and a Lamarkian mechanism.
They MAY have rejected evolution, but they embraced eugenics and eugenics IS Darwinism just as much as evolution is. We are talking about Darwinism here, NOT botany. Stalin may have overlooked Lysenko's crop failure, but he compensated for it by KILLING those he considered lesser peoples.
You can argue against the above two FACTS as much as you want - but all it does is make you look ignorant and deranged.
What FACTS? Akton T-4 and mandatory sterilization are things that eugenicists dream about.